Well The Results Are In

9761 Views 218 Replies 46 Participants Last post by Lancastrian, Feb 2, 2010

john-st3

Discussion Starter · Nov 22, 2009 (Edited by Moderator)

3

first off a BIG thank you to all who attended especially our Scottish cousins

.

good to put a few more faces to names,sorry if i didn't talk to everyone.

i hope you all had a good day. the results were a little strange to say the least but on the whole i think reasonably close????

had a quick chat at the end to the guys who run the place and they were over the moon with the cars and the amount we had.
26 cars ran,21 focii and 5 invaders lol

three cars put up a fight and gave silly results lol

results

name power torques

john-st3 363 348
waito 336 319
st225babe 331 402
mattlong1978 325 387
westie 321 398
loko 320 351
bobsey 320 300
jonnyboy 316 366
rik 308 380
bertiee 303 381
tech ant 283 348
stevie b asbo 277 348
treborrobert2 275 334
richy 273 271
sus 265 349
martin 260 272
ste short 259 253
bear49 258 325
shep76 254 270
orangeman 253 318
five star 252 271

invaders

dave audi rs4 405 330
kev frs mk1 348 349
woody r26r megane 283 322
stu escort cosworth 261 255
kazuyadog st220 249 211

once a again many thanks to all who attended.

john

See less See more

1 - 20 of 219 Posts

Martin...

· #2 · Nov 22, 2009

Most power of the standard bunch goes to me? hahaha

Was very very surprised with what it put out, must of been the service she got yesterday and the fact i never run on anything other than V-Power? lol

Chris

· #3 · Nov 22, 2009

2

Damm wished id have gone now ive always wanted a graph that read 300bhp +

On a serious note, sounds like a great turn out for the ST crew and some cool readings

See less See more

TheCustomTouch

· #4 · Nov 22, 2009

Yeah should of run mine there, what was it measured in? PS?

Martin...

· #5 · Nov 22, 2009

QUOTE(TheCustomTouch @ 22 Nov 2009, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yeah should of run mine there, what was it measured in? PS?

BHP dude as far as i am aware....

Maybe slightly over reading...?

TheCustomTouch

· #6 · Nov 22, 2009

Just a little me reckons

See less See more

Martin...

· #7 · Nov 22, 2009

QUOTE(TheCustomTouch @ 22 Nov 2009, 07:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Just a little me reckons

lol But saying that i know Woodys' Megane wasa very very close reading to what he had at RS Tuning, and the RS4 is pretty much bang on?

See less See more

Jared

· #8 · Nov 22, 2009 (Edited by Moderator)

What gear wre the runs done in ????..Torque figures seem very high

See less See more

Martin...

· #9 · Nov 22, 2009

QUOTE(Speedfreek @ 22 Nov 2009, 07:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>What gear wre the runs done in ????

4th gear mate...

Gardener

· #10 · Nov 22, 2009 (Edited by Moderator)

What gear did they run the ST's in on the rollers?

Edit- to late lol

Jared

· #11 · Nov 22, 2009

QUOTE(Martin... @ 22 Nov 2009, 07:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>4th gear mate...

3rd give a much more accurate result

fishface31a

· #12 · Nov 22, 2009

2

QUOTE(john-st3 @ 22 Nov 2009, 07:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>the results were a little strange to say the least but on the whole i think reasonably close????
results

name power torques

martin 260 325 Quoted figures 225 bhp 236 ft/lb
dave audi rs4 405 330 Quoted figures 420 bhp 317 ft/lb
woody r26r megane 283 322 Quoted figures 230 bhp 229 ft/lb

Close to what lol! What is beyond question is that Andies car has got an impressive torque figure! Are you not a bit suspicious that your car has 33 bhp more than Andies but she has 54 more ft/lb of torque John? 260 and 325 for a standard car is just ridiculous!

See less See more

Gardener

· #13 · Nov 22, 2009

Good old RR lottery

See less See more

TheCustomTouch

· #14 · Nov 22, 2009

7 cars reading over 310bhp with standard turbos is my questioning.

Martin...

· #15 · Nov 22, 2009

2

QUOTE(fishface31a @ 22 Nov 2009, 07:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Close to what lol! What is beyond question is that Andies car has got an impressive torque figure! Are you not a bit suspicious that your car has 33 bhp more than Andies but she has 54 more ft/lb of torque John? 260 and 325 for a standard car is just ridiculous!

Dude that tourqe figure is wrong for mine...

260.1 bhp @ 5638rpm and 272.2 lbft @ 2352 rpm...

I bought the car with a 'suspected' remap, but no proof or invoice handed in when it got traded in at work, hey ho tho, if its standard its standard if mapped, thenso be it lol...

See less See more

Jared

· #16 · Nov 22, 2009

QUOTE(TheCustomTouch @ 22 Nov 2009, 07:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>7 cars reading over 310bhp with standard turbos is my questioning.

Like wise

Martin...

· #17 · Nov 22, 2009

QUOTE(Martin... @ 22 Nov 2009, 07:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Dude that tourqe figure is wrong for mine...

260.1 bhp @ 5638rpm and 272.2 lbft @ 2352 rpm...

I bought the car with a 'suspected' remap, but no proof or invoice handed in when it got traded in at work, hey ho tho, if its standard its standard if mapped, thenso be it lol...

Thats at the fly BHP... At the wheels 227.9 BHP @ 5470 RPM

john-st3

Discussion Starter · #18 · Nov 22, 2009

2

QUOTE(fishface31a @ 22 Nov 2009, 07:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Close to what lol! What is beyond question is that Andies car has got an impressive torque figure! Are you not a bit suspicious that your car has 33 bhp more than Andies but she has 54 more ft/lb of torque John? 260 and 325 for a standard car is just ridiculous!

not suspicious of anything, it's a bit off fun. how the car feels is more important along with safe afr readings.
escort cosworth run had to be aborted due to going very lean after fitting a new turbo

See less See more

Chris

· #19 · Nov 22, 2009

2

John remove your figures from your signature or i will ban ya

Just joshing matey

See less See more

john-st3

Discussion Starter · #20 · Nov 22, 2009

no lol,ban me

1 - 20 of 219 Posts

This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.